Roper grips are among the most recognizable American target stocks because the outside and the inside both tell a story. The outside shows the sculpted thumb rest, ribbon checkering, palm swell, finger placement, and hand-filling contour. The reverse side shows inletting, screw hardware, handwritten or impressed fit notes, and, on many period examples, the small jig holes collectors study closely.

A careful evaluation should never rest on one feature. The strongest identification comes from a pattern: reverse-side jig marks, period workmanship, frame-specific fit, appropriate wood and hardware, Roper-style checkering, honest age, and documentation when available.

First rule of inspection: photograph both sides of both grip panels before cleaning, tightening, sanding, oiling, or trying them on a different revolver. The hidden side often carries the most valuable evidence.

What Roper Grips Are

Walter F. Roper was the designer, shooter, writer, and promoter behind the famous target-stock pattern. Collector literature commonly credits the woodworking to Mathias Gagne, a highly skilled craftsman whose hand work translated Roper’s ideas into wood. Surviving examples vary because these were not modern molded parts; they were hand-shaped stocks made for a shooter, a hand, and a particular handgun frame.

The classic Roper idea was practical before it was decorative. The stocks were meant to repeat the shooter’s hand position, fill empty space behind and below the frame, support the middle finger, and place the thumb and palm consistently. That is why a real inspection must include the grip’s three-dimensional shape, not just its checkering pattern.

c. 1934–1952Commonly cited production era for Roper-marketed target stocks.
GagneMathias Gagne is the craftsman most often associated with original Roper work.
Jig holesSmall reverse-side marks are a major identification clue, not a stand-alone proof.
Hand fitShape, palm swell, finger grooves, and thumb shelf are central to the design.

Reverse-Side Jig Holes: The Feature Collectors Look For First

The most important inspection point is on the back of the grips. Many original Roper-shop examples show small square or rectangular holes, slots, or indentations on the inside of the panels. These are separate from the main grip-screw hole and are widely understood as marks left by a fixture or checkering saddle used to hold the wood while the checkering was cut.

Use cautious language when evaluating them. Matching jig holes on both panels are strong supporting evidence, especially when the marks have age-consistent edges and sit naturally within the inletting. However, their absence does not automatically condemn a set, and their presence does not automatically authenticate one. Other makers used shop fixtures too, and altered or copied stocks can confuse the picture.

Separate screw holes from jig holes.

The large screw opening and escutcheon hardware serve the grip screw. The small square or rectangular marks are the identification clues.

Compare both panels.

Look for corresponding fixture marks, similar aging, matching inletting, and a consistent hand-made layout.

Do not ignore the wood around the holes.

Fresh, sharp, or splintered edges can suggest later drilling, while darkened worn edges better match period handling.

Reverse-Side ClueWhat to Look ForHow to Interpret It
Small jig holes or slotsSquare or rectangular marks inside the panels, separate from the grip-screw passage.Strong supporting evidence for period Roper-shop construction when paired with the right exterior and inletting.
Main grip-screw holeCentral hole aligned with the screw, escutcheon, or bushing.Necessary hardware feature, but not the same thing as a jig-hole identification mark.
Panel-to-panel consistencySimilar aging, comparable fixture marks, and compatible inletting on both sides.Helps detect mismatched panels, later repair work, or altered stocks.
Pencil, stamped, or carved notesNumbers, frame notes, or hand-written fit references inside the wood.Useful provenance clues, but they should agree with the frame fit and overall age.
Fresh cuts or extra holesBright raw wood, rough drilling, plugged holes, or sanding around the inletting.Possible signs of later alteration, forced fit, or reproduction work.

Reverse-Side and Detail Photo Study

Reverse sides of two Roper grip panels showing screw holes and small jig marks
Reverse-side pair view: the interior surfaces show screw hardware, inletting, and the small fixture marks collectors study before making an originality claim.
Upright inside view of Roper grip panels with visible jig-hole locations
Inside-panel orientation view: the grip-screw openings and separate small jig-hole marks can be compared without the revolver frame in the way.
Angled reverse view of Roper stocks highlighting the upper-panel jig-hole area
Angled reverse study: the upper stock panel shows the difference between a central screw passage and the smaller checkering-fixture mark.
Straight reverse view of Roper stock panels showing inletting and tiny rectangular marks
Full reverse study: inletting, edge wear, screw bushings, and the small rectangular marks should all be read together.
Close reverse-side view of Roper grip panels with aged wood and fixture marks
Close reverse-side inspection: age, tool marks, handwritten or impressed fit notes, and jig-hole placement form the most useful evidence.
Exterior view of Roper target stocks with ribbon checkering and raised thumbrest shape
Exterior pair view: ribbon checkering, diamond screw escutcheons, butt flare, and sculpted upper shelves establish the Roper visual language.
Side-on exterior view of Roper stocks showing checkered panels and palm swell
Side profile study: the sweeping checkering borders and palm-filling contour show why outside shape must be compared with the reverse-side evidence.
Close exterior detail of Roper stocks showing checkering borders and screw diamonds
Checkering detail: the diamond-centered screw escutcheons and flowing ribbon borders are useful comparison points for Roper-style workmanship.

Exterior Design Features That Support the Identification

Jig holes matter because they are hard-to-see construction evidence, but the outside still has to look right. A believable Roper grip has sculptural flow. The checkering is not just a texture; it is part of a ribbon-like pattern that organizes the side panel, screw diamond, palm swell, and lower flare.

FeatureCollector Inspection PointWhy It Matters
Thumb restA raised shelf that places the thumb consistently for deliberate target work.One of the most recognizable Roper design elements, especially on right-hand target stocks.
Palm swellA hand-filling swell that may be asymmetric depending on intended hand and use.Shows the stock was shaped around hand position, not merely copied as a flat panel.
Finger grooves and fillerFront contouring and relief below the trigger guard for the middle finger.Roper theory emphasized support and repeatable grip placement under the frame.
Ribbon checkeringFlowing checkered fields bordered by smooth wood, often around a diamond screw escutcheon.A common visual signature, though later Roper-style makers also copied the pattern.
Butt flare and wrapWood that covers and extends around the frame, often with a fuller base.Helps distinguish serious target stocks from simple replacement panels.
Wood and finishWalnut is common; grain, finish, wear, oil staining, cracks, and repairs need close inspection.Condition and originality affect collector confidence and value.

Frame Fit: Colt, Smith & Wesson, and Other Handguns

Roper-style stocks appear on several handguns, including Smith & Wesson and Colt revolvers. The name on the gun does not authenticate the grips. These stocks were shaped for specific frames and, in many cases, specific hands. That makes frame fit one of the most important parts of the inspection.

On Colt Python and related Colt double-action applications, study the screw alignment, backstrap contact, butt coverage, trigger-guard relief, and the way the top of the grip flows into the frame. A grip can look attractive in profile while still showing a later alteration on the reverse side.

Correct fit looks natural. The wood should meet the frame without fresh gaps, forced shoulders, or over-sanded contact points.
Wrong fit leaves evidence. Recut inletting, plugged holes, new screw hardware, and bright interior wood can reveal a later conversion.

Collector Authentication Workflow

1. Photograph first

Capture both exterior and reverse-side views before handling changes the evidence.

2. Map the reverse side

Identify grip-screw holes, escutcheons, jig holes, inletting, fit marks, repairs, and wood color.

3. Compare the exterior

Study thumb rest, checkering ribbon, screw diamond, palm swell, lower flare, and border layout.

4. Confirm frame fit

Test fit only with care. Avoid forcing old wood onto a frame it was not cut to fit.

5. Separate style from origin

“Roper-style” can be honest descriptive language; “original Roper” needs stronger evidence.

6. Preserve documentation

Keep old photos, invoices, notes, and seller descriptions with the grips for future collectors.

Left side Colt Python profile with Roper grips on a clear display stand
Mounted profile: left-side Colt Python view showing full grip coverage, ribbon checkering, and a clear support stand.
Muzzle-forward Colt Python angle showing Roper grip back contour
Muzzle-forward angle: the stocks wrap the back of the frame while the Python rests on a transparent stand.
Colt Python side angle with Roper grip screw diamond and lower wrap visible
Side-angle frame fit: the grip screw diamond, lower wrap, and top shoulder can be checked against the metal frame.
Opposite side Colt Python view with Roper grip checkering beside the trigger guard
Opposite-side study: the checkered panel meets the smooth wood border below the frame and beside the trigger guard.
Backstrap view of a Colt Python wearing Roper grips on a display stand
Backstrap alignment view: the center seam, butt coverage, and side-to-side stock fit are easiest to inspect from the rear.
Rear three-quarter Colt Python view showing Roper grip thumbrest and hammer area
Rear three-quarter view: the raised shelf, backstrap fit, and upper grip shoulder can be compared in one photograph.
Left rear close view of Roper grip checkering and Colt Python cylinder area
Left rear close-up: the checkering border and the metal-to-wood transition behind the cylinder are shown in shallow depth of field.
Colt Python left side with Roper grips and barrel address in focus
Left-side barrel view: a clean profile for judging how the grip’s top shelf flows into the Python frame.
Colt Python on black round stand with Roper grip palm swell visible
Round-stand view: the palm swell and lower grip contour are visible from a slightly rearward angle.
Close left-side Python frame view emphasizing Roper grip upper shoulder
Upper-shoulder detail: the smooth wood shelf below the frame contrasts with the checkered side panel.
Colt Python side profile with Roper grips on green background
Green-background profile: the Roper stock fills the hand space below the Python frame while preserving a slim upper shoulder.
Right side Colt Python angle with Roper grip and acrylic stand
Right-side mounted view: the grip screw, lower flare, and butt profile are presented without hand coverage.
Close-up of Roper grip panel below the Colt Python trigger guard
Trigger-guard close-up: the upper grip shoulder and front relief show the hand-filling target-stock geometry.
Close rear view of Roper grip checkering against the Colt Python backstrap
Backstrap close-up: the metal frame line and checkered grip panel meet along a narrow vertical seam.
Macro angle of Roper grip screw diamond with Colt Python frame blurred behind it
Macro screw-detail view: the brass-colored screw bushing sits inside a diamond surrounded by flowing checkering borders.
Full side photograph of Colt Python with Roper grips on dark background
Dark-background full profile: the Python and Roper stocks are shown as a complete display combination.
Right side Colt Python view with Roper grip checkering and black background
Right-side dark view: the barrel line, cylinder, and checkered grip panel provide a clear fit-and-form reference.
Tighter right side view of Colt Python with Roper grip and clear stand
Tighter right-side study: the grip screw, upper shelf, and barrel address appear in a compact comparison view.
Colt Python with Roper grips photographed on black cloth and chairs in background
Black-cloth display view: the stocks are seen from a slightly elevated angle with the revolver supported at the muzzle.
Elevated Colt Python display angle with Roper grip lower flare visible
Elevated display angle: the lower grip flare and topstrap line are visible from above the acrylic stand.
Top-down rear view of Colt Python backstrap and rounded Roper grip butt
Top-down butt view: the rounded grip base, center seam, and backstrap alignment can be checked from above.
Barrel-forward view looking over Colt Python cylinder toward Roper grip butt
Barrel-forward top view: the muzzle and cylinder frame the distant Roper butt profile for a lengthwise fit check.
Shooter hand around Roper grips demonstrating finger-groove and thumb-shelf contact
Hand-fit demonstration: the grooves, thumb shelf, and filler below the trigger guard show how the stock indexes the hand.
Close Colt Python grip profile showing Roper contour near the frame
Grip-profile close-up: the mounted stock can be judged for smooth frame transition, checkering placement, and palm support.
Top close-up of Roper grip mounted on Colt Python with trigger guard nearby
Top-side close-up: the grip panel, screw diamond, and trigger guard show the target-stock contour from above.
Bottom-side close-up of Roper grip checkering and Colt Python trigger area
Bottom-side close-up: the sweeping checkering ribbon and butt flare are shown from beneath the mounted revolver.

Red Flags and Common Misreadings

IssueWhy It MattersWhat to Do
Only the outside looks rightMany later makers copied the Roper look.Remove the panels carefully and inspect reverse-side construction clues.
Jig holes are treated as absolute proofCollector discussions note exceptions and similar shop marks from other makers.Use jig holes as supporting evidence, not the whole case.
Fresh inletting or new holesMay indicate conversion to another frame or a reproduction made to fit a valuable gun.Photograph the cuts and compare color, edges, and screw alignment.
Over-restored finishSanding and refinishing can erase tool marks, soften borders, and reduce collector value.Prefer careful preservation over cosmetic improvement.

Care and Preservation

Old custom stocks should be stabilized, not modernized. Avoid sanding, reshaping, soaking, aggressive oiling, and experimental finishes. Store wood away from high heat, long sunlight exposure, and damp conditions. When removing panels, use a correctly fitting screwdriver and support the wood so the escutcheon area is not stressed.

The goal is not to make vintage grips look new. The goal is to preserve the honest evidence that lets the next collector understand what they are.

Gun Collectors Club field note

Roper Grips FAQs

Do jig holes prove a set is original?

No. They are an important clue, especially when small square or rectangular marks appear on both reverse-side panels, but they should be evaluated with checkering, inletting, wood age, screw hardware, frame fit, and provenance.

Can genuine Roper grips lack visible jig holes?

Collector discussions describe possible exceptions, so absence alone should not end the analysis. It should make the rest of the evidence more important.

What is the difference between Roper and Roper-style?

Roper-style means the shape or checkering pattern follows Roper influence. Original Roper is a stronger claim that requires evidence connecting the stocks to period Roper-shop work.

Should old Roper grips be refinished?

Usually, no. Refinishing can remove age evidence, soften borders, alter color, and make reverse-side details harder to interpret.

Greg Cook author portrait for Gun Collectors Club reference articles

About Greg Cook

Greg writes these pages as a collector and hobbyist. The firearms and accessories shown are presented for historical reference, photographs, and collector discussion; they are not sale listings.

Collector Reference Books

Good books, careful photographs, and honest notes are the backbone of serious collecting.

Shop My Library

Research Notes

Sources & References

Use these sources as starting points, then verify any high-value grip set with direct photographs, side-by-side comparison, and knowledgeable collector review.

  1. GUNS Magazine, “Resurrecting The Roper Grip” — background on Walter Roper, Mathias Gagne, and the hand-made character of surviving Roper grips.
  2. GUNS Magazine, “Past Masters of the Double-Action Sixgun: Part 4” — discussion of Roper’s design principles and Gagne’s woodworking role.
  3. Smith & Wesson Forum, “Vintage Custom Grips by Gagne, Sanderson, Farrant, Hurst…” — collector discussion of jig holes, ribbon checkering, wood, fit notes, and authentication caveats.
  4. Smith & Wesson Forum, “Roper style grips (pics)” — detailed discussion of reverse-side rectangular jig indentations and comparison with other makers’ marks.
  5. Sack Peterson, “Roper’s grips were made by two stock makers in his employ” — collector reference on Roper production, Gagne/Nichols shop work, and checkering-saddle jig holes.
  6. American Handgunner, “A True Sixgunner’s Dream” — modern context for Roper-style stocks and their continuing influence among sixgun collectors.